Hardik Pandya Divorce: Could MI Captain Lose 70% Of Property To Natasa Stankovic?

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Hardik Himanshu Pandya (@hardikpandya93)

bolt Top News

flash_on

BTS Joins Star-Studded iHeartRadio Music Festival 2026 Lineup With Cardi B and Benson Boone

NEW

flash_on

BTS ARIRANG Becomes Biggest Global Album Of 2026 With 10.18 Million Sales Milestone

flash_on

BTS To Make Special Appearance At American Music Awards 2026 After Four-Year Gap

flash_on

BTS Stanford Stadium Concert Live: ARIRANG Tour Turns Bay Area Into a K-Pop Festival

Pandya and Natasa were not seen together for a long time. Both of them last shared a picture on social media on February 14. After this both met in an event. After this, Natasa Stankovic used Pandya's nickname on Instagram. Natasa has also adopted this name. And Natasa has not come to support Hardik's team in IPL.

Also Read: Swati Maliwal Claims Death Threats Following Controversial Video Release By YouTuber Dhruv Rathee

After this, rumors spread that the quarrel between the two has crossed the limits. After their divorce, now 70 percent of Hardik's wealth belongs to Natasha. Hardik Pandya has assets worth crores. Hardik Pandya has earned crores of wealth from IPL remuneration, BCCI money and advertising.

Hardik pandya is a smart man, Hardik Pandya knew about this divorce thing can happen with Natasha...????
Natasha was considering herself very smart, Nagin ????????#HardikPandya #divorce #NatasaStankovic pic.twitter.com/eVtSVhNSen

— Dr. Shah Alam  (@EkAazaad) May 25, 2024

Hardik Pandya has an apartment in Mumbai. It has been reported by the media that it will cost Rs 30 crore. He also has a penthouse in Baroda. It costs crores of rupees. One of the most talked about aspects of the rumored divorce is the claim that Natasa might demand 70% of Hardik’s assets as part of the settlement. This rumor has been fueled by an old clip from the show ‘Breakfast with Champions,’ where Hardik mentioned that his property is registered under his mother’s name, potentially complicating any asset division in case of a divorce.